Tag Archives: privacy

Personal Data Ecosystem & FTC’s ‘Do Not Track’ policy for consumer privacy

Dan Ryan on his blog informs about an interesting graph of "Personal Data Ecosystem." which attempts to portray a four-mode network : individuals, data collectors, data brokers, and data users.

personal data ecosystem

In another post Dan informs about The Federal Trade Commission’s preliminary report, "Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change, (pdf) " from one of the many things , it suggests the "do not track" option for web surfers like “Do Not Call” registry in telecom industry which  also got covered in NYT article – F.T.C. Backs Plan to Honor Privacy of Online Users 

Visit Dan Ryan’s blog for more details

Jeffrey Rosen on permanent web footprints and the end of forgetting

Jeffrey Rosen, a law professor at George Washington University writes an excellent piece on NYTimes ‘The Web Means the End of Forgetting

"We’ve known for years that the Web allows for unprecedented voyeurism, exhibitionism, and inadvertent indiscretion, but we are only beginning to understand the costs of an age in which so much of what we say, and of what others say about us, goes into our permanent — and public — digital files. The fact that the Internet never seems to forget is, at an almost existential level, threatening to our ability to control our identities; to preserve the option of reinventing ourselves and starting anew. In a recent book, Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age, the cyberscholar Viktor Mayer-Schönberger cites the case of Stacy Snyder — who was denied a teaching certificate on the basis of a single photo on MySpace — as a reminder of the importance of ‘societal forgetting.’ By erasing external memories, he says in the book, ‘our society accepts that human beings evolve over time, that we have the capacity to learn from past experiences and adjust our behavior.’ In traditional societies, where missteps are observed but not necessarily recorded, the limits of human memory ensure that people’s sins are eventually forgotten. By contrast, Mayer-Schönberger notes, a society in which everything is recorded ‘will forever tether us to all our past actions, making it impossible, in practice, to escape them.’ He concludes that ‘without some form of forgetting, forgiving becomes a difficult undertaking.‘"

There’s also a great video of Prof Jeffrey Rosen on Youtube ‘Is Privacy Dead ?’

Christopher “moot” Poole’s TED talk on Online Anonymity

From TED Blog: “The founder of 4chan, a controversial, uncensored online imageboard, describes its subculture, some of the Internet "memes" it has launched, and the incident in which its users managed a very public, precision hack of a mainstream media website. The talk raises questions about the power — and price — of anonymity.”

Privacy – Whatever it is but we can’t afford to believe in it

Privacy is just a sense or a feeling that you are secluded from the presence or view of others or free from unsanctioned intrusion. This post mostly deals with privacy in the digital world but takes examples from real world, where privacy only exists as a concept and too idealistic to be true. At the same time, I am not suggesting that we must not fight for our privacy in the real world or the online world, but the onus is mostly with us and that too with too many fine prints which we can never understand.

Who mostly makes your private life public

For your privacy, you must be more concerned with people around you, the people you know really well – the friends and the relatives. These are the people who are the weak links in your social networks – they make access to your information available outside the circle of trust through – stupidity, casualness, deception, hate, ignorance, etc.  Most of the embarrassing scandals reported in media, doesn’t happen through hacking or any other form of unauthorized access but through one of the parties actually involved in the act.

Is your data safe anywhere ?

The complex answer is blah blah blah and the simple answer in NO !. Any system which is accessible to humans or managed by humans is not yet proved to be 100% safe and trustworthy. Do you know how easily your telephone or mobile bill report is accessible to (some of )the employees of a telecom company. Do you know that your web sites visits, mails, time logs and so many other internet activities can actually be read on the serves of your ISPs datacenter. Do you know there’s a thing called Lawful Inspection & Monitoring which is simply put, your private information on demand by your government from any of these digital communications network.

What is the solution then ?

There’s a little bit of behavioral change required from the users side (as well). Of course we can’t afford to loose all our communication through these social communication networks. But think about it, shouldn’t you bring little bit of mis-trust back again in your life and not (put a blind) trust on the people or the systems around you. Are you aware that you automatically drop the natural hard-coded judgmental & fight or flight response when you are communicating online.

Why do we think it’s our duty to tweet, follow, like, share, comment and fill all the details in the online forms. Has world become really so safe. Don’t we read newspapers.

The corporate world which is buying social media snake oil in tons and gallons doesn’t even know what is the inside information which is being served outside. Every tom, dick and harry who has a twitter account has become the spokes person of the company. Idealistic naked corporation blah blah aside, how many of the workers have an understanding of work / life social presence and communication.

As we consume junk food, we are entering in to the world of speedy junk communication and as we are compromising our health – we are compromising our privacy as well. If we believe in the old ways and the way our parents used to talk to us the simple answer would be – Shut Up and Behave !!!

What we should be doing then ?

We need to slow down and listen to real signals than noises. To stop rushing to social media snake oil vendors and to understand from the academicians, sociologists, researchers, scientists, anthropologists, thinkers and tech geeks ( and very soon they should form an advocacy and activism group together). We can’t trust politicians, policy makers and businessmen to find solution to privacy. We haven’t seen such resolution in education, health care and human rights issues and can’t be expecting it with digital privacy issues.

  • Why should we be just talking about Facebook, why no one is talking about standardized privacy protocols across digital communication channels.
  • How are we even so easily allowing a legal privacy loophole to a company which has a 5000+ words privacy policy document.
  • How can a system exist which allows to change your privacy settings by default on a new feature introduction
  • How can a communication network have millions of ways of collecting data from me and not a single way of giving me my data back
  • Why no country has a pre-emptive and proactive regulatory framework. We have it for telecom, then why not for the web ?
  • Like we have certificates for secure sites, isn’t the time to introduce privacy check points and certifications for digital communication channels.
  • Last but not the least – on the public web don’t expect a private environment.

There’s no simple answer yet, but till that time only believe in this thing (however pessimistic it might be) – don’t trust humans and the environments involving human beings. Read your history books again and go through the acts of crimes committed by your very own trustworthy government.

The chances of Mr. Zuckerberg, or some hacker or some marketer reading your data is far far far far less than a weak link within your own social network ready to compromise it with a greater probability 24/7.

[Re-edited, 5/16/2010 1.30 AM]

The 1st ever Choose Privacy Week

Privacyrevolution.Org informs: Choose Privacy Week is a new initiative that invites library users into a national conversation about privacy rights in a digital age. The campaign gives libraries the tools they need to educate and engage users, and gives citizens the resources to think critically and make more informed choices about their privacy.

The first-ever Choose Privacy Week will take place May 2-8, 2010 and is a new program created by the American Library Association to help librarians organize events in their communities about the role that privacy plays in their lives, why privacy is important, and how their privacy can be compromised on a daily basis.

Join the revolution here and find some great tools and resource materials.

Choose Privacy Week Video from 20K Films on Vimeo.

Choose Privacy Week Trailer from 20K Films on Vimeo.

Danah Boyd on – Privacy and Publicity in the Context of Big Data

danah boyd Dr. Danah Boyd gave a  keynote at the WWW Conference in Raleigh, North Carolina. 

She spoke about methodological and ethical issues involved in the study of Big Data, focusing heavily on privacy issues in light of public data.  The first third focuses on four important arguments:

  • Bigger Data are Not Always Better Data;
  • Not All Data are Created Equal;
  • What and Why are Different Questions;
  • Be Careful of Your Interpretations.

She argues :  “Just because data is accessible doesn’t mean that using it is ethical,” providing a series of different ways of looking at how people think about privacy and publicity.  I conclude by critiquing Facebook’s approach to privacy, from News Feed to Social Plugins/Instant Personalizer.

Read the full report Privacy and Publicity in the Context of Big Data

Is the privacy dead, then why are you talking about it

Google and Facebook almost hint the death of the privacy dead, but is it really and if it is dead then why are they talking about is. Bruce Schneier on Forbes talks about this Google And Facebook’s Privacy Illusion:

In January Facebook Chief Executive, Mark Zuckerberg, declared the age of privacy to be over. A month earlier, Google Chief Eric Schmidt expressed a similar sentiment. Add Scott McNealy’s and Larry Ellison’s comments from a few years earlier, and you’ve got a whole lot of tech CEOs proclaiming the death of privacy–especially when it comes to young people.

It’s just not true. People, including the younger generation, still care about privacy. Yes, they’re far more public on the Internet than their parents: writing personal details on Facebook, posting embarrassing photos on Flickr and having intimate conversations on Twitter. But they take steps to protect their privacy and vociferously complain when they feel it violated. They’re not technically sophisticated about privacy and make mistakes all the time, but that’s mostly the fault of companies and Web sites that try to manipulate them for financial gain.

Bruce Schneier is a security technologist and the Chief Security Technology Officer of BT. You can read more of his writing at www.schneier.com. Recently he gave a talk on on "Security, Privacy, and the Generation Gap", the video of which is available here.